Legal Opinion
Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Merchandise Nat. Bank of Chicago O'Riley v. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1953No. 13039PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
At all pertinent times, Merchandise National Bank of Chicago, hereafter called plaintiff, was a national banking association located in Illinois and having its principal office at Chicago, Illinois; Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, hereafter called defendant, was a national banking association located in California and having its principal office at San Francisco, California, and a branch, called its East Bakersfield branch, at Bakersfield, California; United Produce Company, hereafter called United, was an Illinois corporation; Eugene J. O’Riley…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Bank of California v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- National Bank of New Zealand, Ltd. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Weiner v. RoofCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of America v. Universal Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Powell v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pupko v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981