German-American Monogram Mfrs. v. Johnson
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON Appeal from the Circnit Court of Davidson County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court.- — A. Q-. Rutherford, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fancher
The suit is to recover for the price of certain monogram designs sold the defendant upon the express representation that the defendant should have the exclusive sale of these goods in the city of Nashville. The fact that Johnson was to handle the goods exclusively was a material element in the contract, and without which the contract would not have been made. The company breached this provision by selling the same goods to another dealer in the city of Nashville. De*573fenses were interposed by defendant that the account is not a just claim; that it is frandnlent and void; that it is without dne…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- A. Landreth Co. v. SchevenelTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Weakley v. PageTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Koerner v. HennAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Koener v. HennAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Silberstein v. GuttridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Young v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Bolan v. CaballeroTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
- Cannon v. ChadwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Shell Oil Co. v. State Tire & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Massey v. HardcastleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.