Legal Opinion
Henebury v. Cabot
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 26, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. Upon the death of the original plaintiff after a verdict in her favor her administrator appeared . as plaintiff and prosecuted the action. Where the word . plaintiff is hereinafter used the original plaintiff is meant. The only exception of the defendants is to the denial of their motion for a directed verdict.
The plaintiff, who was about seventy-six years old, fell and was injured in the lower hallway of a building owned and within the control of the defendants, while she was on her way by appointment to visit her physician who had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cummings v. National Shawmut Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Marston v. ReynoldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Crone v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Denny v. Riverbank Court Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Benton v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Heina v. Broadway Fruit Market, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Cohen v. DaviesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Tetrault v. GhibelliniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Peay v. ReidyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Herman v. GoldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.