Legal Opinion
Cummings v. National Shawmut Bank of Boston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 27, 1933PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action brought by a lawyer to recover for legal services rendered the defendant, and for certain expenses incurred in connection with an action brought by the defendant against the Border City Manufacturing Company. The action was tried before a judge of the Superior Court without a jury who found for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,300.09. During the course of the trial the defendant excepted to the refusal of the judge to strike out certain testimony. The defendant also excepted to the refusal of the judge to grant certain requests for rulings and to allow a new trial.
It appears…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orpin v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Crowley v. SwansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Ferris v. Ray Taxi Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Inhabitants of Westport v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Blair v. Columbian Fireproofing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. DomanskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co., Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Accusoft Corporation, Appellant\cross-Appellee v. James L. Palo Simon Weiczner Individually and D/B/A Snowbound Software, Appellees\cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Covich v. ChambersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.