Pike v. Sutton
Supreme Court of Georgia
Certiorari. Before Judge Harris. Coweta. superior court. November 6, 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
1. A clerk in a retail store, whose duties are such as to keep him employed one half of his time in “ drudgery and hard work,” one fourth of his time “ in waiting on customers in the sale of goods, and one fourth waiting for customer,” is a laborer within the meaning of the laws of this State exempting from garnishment the wages of laborers. Oliver v. Macon. Hardware Co., 98 Ga. 249; Stuart v. Poole, 112 Ga. 818.
2. The court below was right in sustaining the certiorari, but, instead of rendering a final judgment, should have ordered a new trial in the magistrate’s court. See Holmes v. Pye,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Holmes v. Pye & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Stuart v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howell v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. J. M. High Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Bryan v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Stothart v. MeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903