United States v. Krueger
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from the district court’s order granting Defendant-Appellee Zachary Krueger’s motion to suppress evidence seized in Oklahoma pursuant to a warrant that was issued by a United States magistrate judge in Kansas. In granting Krueger’s motion, the district court concluded that suppression was necessary because (1) the warrant violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 41, which generally limits a federal magistrate judge’s warrant-issuing authority to the district where he or she sits, and (2) Krueger established that he was prejudiced by the Rule 41 violation. On appeal,…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Steven HortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- State of Tennessee v. Charlotte Lynn Frazier And Andrea ParksTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
- United States v. Gabriel WerdeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Bryan HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.