Legal Opinion

In re Whitman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1998No. 96-1487PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

We are asked to decide whether a party to a dissolution of marriage is entitled to relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B) when at the time he or she consented to a separation agreement, he or she was unaware that it contained material omissions, mistakes, and misstatements with regard to property belonging to the couple. We must also decide the effect, if any, of the opposing party’s remarriage upon the court’s Civ.R. 60(B) analysis.

For the reasons that follow, we hold that where the parties to a dissolution have expressly agreed in a separation agreement that the agreement may be modified…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Colley v. BazellOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Knapp v. KnappOhio Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Morris v. Morris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Waterfall Victoria Master Fund Ltd. v. YeagerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Ross v. OlsavskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In re WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Molnar-Satterfield v. MolnarOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API