Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Capital Cities/ABC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 17, 1995No. 93 Civ 6461 (VLB)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

I

Plaintiff Robert Chambers in this age discrimination case has objected to two rulings by United States Magistrate Judge Mark D. Fox of November 17, 1994. The first order declined to authorize ex parte interviews by plaintiffs counsel of defendant Capital Cities/ABC (“Capital Cities” or “defendant”) current employees.1 Plaintiff argues that the result is to make it effectively impossible for plaintiff to secure relevant information.

In the second ruling to which plaintiff has objected the Magistrate Judge declined to authorize plaintiffs…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Saini v. International Game TechnologyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  2. Perricone v. PerriconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  4. In Re JDS Uniphase Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
  5. RIJ PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. v. Ivax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API