Legal Opinion

Commerce Insurance Co. v. Merrill Gas Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1955PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

It is the position of the appellant, Merrill Gas Company, that its motions for summary judgment in the several cases should have been granted for the reason that the franchise ordinance is controlling as to the respective rights and duties of the parties, and that under the provisions of said ordinance, the Gas Company had no duty to maintain the gas apparatus inside the curb line, because it was installed by the customer, at his expense, upon his property, and that he was the owner of it and had the sole duty of maintaining it in repair. The Gas Company also submits that its only duty in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colton v. FoulkesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Freitas v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Weber v. NaasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Atlas Investment Co. v. ChristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clark v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McGuire v. Stein's Gift & Garden Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Kanios v. FrederickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Brunner v. Van HoofWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. TaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API