Atlas Investment Co. v. Christ
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The purpose to be served by the summary-judgment statute so far as it relates to motions by plaintiff, is to prevent interposition of false or frivolous answers for the purposes of accomplishing a delay in the securing of a just judgment. The statute is, however, drastic and is to be availed of only when it is apparent that there is no substantial issue to be tried. Prime Mfg. Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp. (1938) 229 Wis. 348, 349, 350, 281 N. W. 697. It is not a substitute for a regular trial nor does it authorize trial of controlling issues on affidavits.
The answer in this case setg out…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- McLoughlin v. MalnarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Kinney v. KruseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by15 opinions
- Eaton v. DowneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Bjornsen Construction Co. v. J. A. Whitmer & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Commerce Insurance Co. v. Merrill Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Batson v. NicholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.