Legal Opinion

Torch Rubber Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 28, 1958No. C. D. 2035PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

Paragraph 1530 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Presidential proclamations reported in T. D. 53865 and T. D. 53877, imposes duties on imported footwear—

* * * the uppers of which are composed wholly or in chief value of wool, cotton, ramie, animal hair, rayon or other synthetic textile, silk, or substitutes for any of the foregoing * * * [Italics added.]

—depending upon the material of which the soles are wholly or in chief value composed. If the soles are composed wholly or in chief value of india rubber or substitutes for rubber, the duty is 20 per centum ad…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swiss Manufactures Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Dorward & Sons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cornet Stores v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Moltofoam Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API