Legal Opinion

Dorward & Sons Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 28, 1950No. C. D. 1290PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of these protests consists of rapeseed oil which was admitted free of duty under the provision for denatured rapeseed oil in paragraph 1732 of the Tariff Act of 1930 but upon which a tax or duty at the rate of 4% cents per *19pound was assessed under tbe provision in section 2491 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U. S. C. § 2491 (b)) for rapeseed oil. In each, of the protests the oil is claimed to be entitled to the exemption from duty granted under section 2491 (f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the pertinent portion of which reads as follows:

§2491.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weilbacher v. MerrittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
  2. United States v. RosensteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
  3. E. C. Hazard & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  4. Petru American Importing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Torch Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API