Legal Opinion

Cornet Stores v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 12, 1965No. C.D. 2527Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

Tbe merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, described on the invoices as toyo cloth sneakers, consists of rubber-soled footwear with toyo cloth uppers. It was imported from Japan and entered at the port of Los Angeles, during 1960. Counsel stipulated at the trial that the articles were in chief value of rubber, and the material of the uppers was referred to both as toyo cloth and as toyo paper. The shoes were classified as footwear, the uppers of which are composed wholly or in chief value of a substitute for cotton, with soles wholly or in chief value…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Japan Import Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Torch Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API