Legal Opinion

People v. Surety Insurance Co. of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1973No. Docket Nos. 11373, 11374PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AULT, Acting P. J.

Two proceedings by the People to enforce bail forfeitures have been consolidated on appeal. In each case, Surety Insurance Company of California has appealed from an order of the superior court entering a summary judgment on a defaulted bail bond nunc pro tunc and denying its motion to vacate an earlier entry of summary judgment and to exonerate the bail. We conclude the summary judgments were not entered as required by law, and that Penal Code section 1306 dictates the reversal of the orders and the exoneration of the bonds.

The facts are not in dispute, and, insofar…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. EarhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Roth v. MarstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Resolute Insurance v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. County of Los Angeles v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. North Beach Bonding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. Topa InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API