Legal Opinion
Roth v. Marston
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1952No. Civ. 18632PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal from an order granting a new trial after judgment entered on a verdict for defendant.
The notice of intention to move for a new trial named as grounds of the motion all of the causes specified in section 657 of the Code of Civil Procedure except excessive damages. There is no contention here, however, that any cause was well taken except the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.
On January 19, 1951, plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was granted. In granting the motion the court orally stated it was granted “upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Howard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Thomas v. DriscollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bloniarz v. RolosonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Siegal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Bed, Bath & Beyond of La Jolla, Inc. v. La Jolla Village Square Venture PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kralyevich v. MagriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- National Farmers Union Auto. & Cas. Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.