Ladd v. General Insurance Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
After bringing without success an action upon a policy of fire insurance, the plaintiff .brought a second action upon an alleged settlement agreement. In the second action, the plaintiffs received favorable consideration from the jury in answer to certain interrogatories, but these were set aside upon motion of the defendant. The trial court ruled that the first judgment was res judicata. The plaintiffs now appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the insurance company.
The parties were identical in both actions. The only issue is whether the trial court in the second action properly applied…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Fischer-Kimsey Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Jarvy v. MowreyOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Sheppard v. BlitzOregon Supreme Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Clark v. ElzaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Lee v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Savelich Logging Company v. Preston Mill CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Stone v. BENEFICIAL STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Andrysek v. AndrysekOregon Supreme Court · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.