Legal Opinion
Fischer-Kimsey Co. v. King
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 2, 1945No. 32150PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an original proceeding brought by Fischer-Kimsey Company, the employer, and its insurance carrier, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, to review an award made to James M. King, hereinafter called respondent.
The record discloses without substantial conflict that on the 4th day of January, 1944, respondent sustained a severe and serious accidental injury. This accident was known to the employees of the Fischer-Kimsey Company and its managing agent was thoroughly advised of the accident at the time it happened and sent the respondent to a physician for treatment.
On the 19th day of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Protho v. NetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Skelly Oil Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Nuway Laundry Co. v. TriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. RouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Jones v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Ladd v. General Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Baash-Ross Tool Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. KincannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.