Legal Opinion

Bobe v. Lloyds

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 1, 1926No. 135Published

1Opinion of the Court

10 F.2d 730 (1926)

BOBE

v.

LLOYDS et al.[*]

No. 135.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 1, 1926.

William Otis Badger, Jr., of New York City (Paul D. Compton and Milo Otis Bennett, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Barry, Wainwright, Thacher & Symmers, of New York City (Herbert Barry, James K. Symmers, and Archibald G. Thacher, all of New York City, of counsel), appearing specially for Lloyds.

Before ROGERS, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error brings this action to recover insurance she said she obtained for the loss of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API