Legal Opinion
Amy L.T. v. Robert L.O.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 18, 2001No. 95,611PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. REIF, Vice Chief Judge.
{1 The question presented for decision is whether the trial court correctly applied 10 O.S. Supp.2000 § 7505-4.2 (B)(1) in deciding that C.D.O. was not eligible for adoption without the consent of his natural father. This statute provides that consent of a parent is not required when the parent willfully fails, refuses, or neglects to pay child support "for a period of twelve (12) consecutive months out of the last fourteen (14) months immediately preceding ... the petition for adoption ... [iln substantial compliance with an order ... adjudicating the duty,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- McNeill v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Newcomb v. SchaefflerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Curtis v. Registered Dentists of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Adoption of LdsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007