Legal Opinion · Dissent

Percival v. Cooper

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1974No. 13548Published

1DissentCrockett, Justice

(dissenting) :

It is to be borne in mind that this case is in its essence an action to reform a deed to compel the defendant grantors to keep the promise they had made, both orally and in writing, to convey to the plaintiffs one-half acre of land. The deed itself is not properly regarded as the sole agreement between the parties. It was executed unilaterally by the defendant grantors, purportedly to fulfill their prior written commitment.

As cited below, the authorities are abundant and unanimous that where there has been a mutual mistake, or a unilateral mistake, accompanied by inequitable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Broida v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Barker v. DunhamUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Naisbitt v. HodgesUtah Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API