Broida v. Travelers Insurance

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This is an action of assumpsit to reform a policy of insurance, issued by the defendant company to the plaintiff, Samuel Broida, and to recover on it as reformed. From judgment entered on the verdict, defendant appealed, assigning as error the refusal of its motions for binding instructions and for judgment n. o. v.

On or about April 16, 1931, plaintiff decided to remodel and enlarge a certain building in Burgettstown, Washington County, owned by him and occupied by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company as tenant. He applied to the defendant for a policy of public…