Legal Opinion
Verson Wilkins Ltd. v. Allied Products Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 21, 1989No. 87 C 5325PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
We have before us the summary judgment motions of plaintiffs Verson Wilkins Limited and Verson [U.K.] (collectively “VIL”) applicable to count V of the verified third amended complaint 1 and the amended counterclaim submitted by defendant Allied Products Corporation (“Allied”). 2 Resolution of these motions centers on the legality of various contractual arrangements under both the common law (as unreasonable restraints of trade) and also under the antitrust laws of the United States and the State of Illinois. VIL contends summary judgment is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Perceptron, Inc. v. Sensor Adaptive Machines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London & Companies in Interest, Subscribing to Cover Notes RLJ2197 and RLJ2197a v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Verson Corp. v. Verson International Group PLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Chavez v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- In the Matter of the Complaint of Jason Leggitt as Owner of the Malibu Motor Vessel Hull Identification No. MB2S9035D616, Being Approx. 23 Ft. in LengthDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.