Legal Opinion

Perceptron, Inc. v. Sensor Adaptive Machines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2000No. Nos. 99-1456, 99-1458PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, Perceptron, Inc., and defendant, Sensor Adaptive Machines, Inc. (SAMI), appeal from the judgment entered following a jury trial on their respective claims and the district court’s disposition of several post-trial motions. The jury found in favor of Perceptron on its breach of contract claim, alleging that SAMI breached a non-compete agreement, and the jury awarded Perceptron $732,223.19 in damages. The jury found against SAMI on its counterclaims, which alleged that the non-compete agreement violated antitrust laws and that Perceptron’s…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  5. Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Innovation Ventures v. Liquid ManufacturingMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Custom Nutrition Labs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Seton Company v. Lear CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Steffes v. Pepsi-Cola Personnel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. W.P.M. Construction Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API