Legal Opinion
Crowell Corporation v. Topkis Construction Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided June 11, 1971PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTIE, Judge.
The moving parties are subcontractors. Plaintiff is the owner of the building on which the moving parties worked as subcontractors. In this suit plaintiff has sued the general contractor, Topkis Construction Company, and the architect, Howard R. Greenhouse, for damages arising from alleged defects in a building which is a combined plant, warehouse and office building. But plaintiff also included as defendants a number of subcontractors hired by the general contractor and not by plaintiff. Plaintiff had no direct contractual relationship with the moving defendants, but…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1955
- Hunter v. Quality Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1949
- A. J. P. Contracting Corp. v. Brooklyn Builders Supply Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- A. J. P. Contracting Corp. v. Brooklyn Builders Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Dorr-Oliver Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Nemours FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Guardian Construction Co. v. Tetra Tech Richardson, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1990
- Ritter v. Custom Chemicides, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.