Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1993No. S-91-837PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Pursuant to verdict, the district court adjudged the defendant-appellant, Clarence J. Williams, guilty of first degree assault, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-308(1) (Reissue 1989). The Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and remanded the cause for a new trial because of the district court’s refusal of Williams’ request that the jury be instructed on the elements of third degree assault, which he claims to be a lesser offense included within the crime of first degree assault. In the course of doing so, the Court of Appeals characterized first degree assault as a specific…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. People v. FigueroaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United States v. Aurora Canales and Elia GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Alfred ManuszakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. Fernandez-MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hopkins v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. State v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API