State v. Jeffries
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
Faced in this criminal further review proceeding with a lesser-included offense issue, we take this opportunity to reexamine our approach to the lesser-included offense doctrine and conclude it should be modified.
The State argues that the court of appeals erred in reversing James J. Jeffries’ insurrection conviction because of the district court’s refusal to submit his requested jury instructions on lesser-included offenses. The State also argues that the defendant waived the lesser-included offense issue because he neither cited authority nor discussed the issue. See Iowa…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- State v. OndayogSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- State v. McKettrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- State of Iowa v. David Lee MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State v. MeadorsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.