Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. ROTHLISBERGER

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1962No. Appeals, 12, 13, 14, and 15PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

Appellants Robert C. Hitchen and Robert Rothlisberger were jointly indicted and tried for the crimes of rape, robbery, receiving stolen goods, and aggravated assault and battery; and they were found guilty by a jury of fornication and aggravated assault and battery, *453and. not guilty of the other crimes. Their motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial having been refused, these appeals followed.

Of the several matters assigned as error, we deem it necessary to discuss only two of them, since one justifies the granting of a new trial. The other alleged errors will…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. O'BRIENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Miller v. Exeter BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Lyke v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Commonwealth v. WeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Commonwealth v. GoetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. PackardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. People v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API