Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Isaacson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1921No. 16459PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Allen, J., entered January 7, 1921, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on promissory notes, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

The plaintiff brought suit against Gust F. Isaacson to obtain judgment upon several promissory notes. The notes were on a printed form and contained the following clause with reference to attorney’s fees: “and in case suit or action is instituted to collect this note, or any portion thereof, I promise and agree to pay, in addition to the costs and disbursements provided by statute................. Dollars in like gold coin for attorney’s fees in said suit or action.” After the commencement of the suit, the original defendant died, and the executrix of his estate was substituted. The case was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McIlroy v. McIlroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Strough v. GearIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Myers v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. McGonigle v. Susquehanna Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. More v. ThayerNew York Supreme Court · 1850

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Stevenson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Fies v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Paste-Ups Unlimited, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  4. Boundary Dam Constructors v. Lawco Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Foreman Brothers Banking Co. v. HandyMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API