Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 31, 1990No. 8024PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) and unlawful restraint in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-95. In his appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) should have suppressed identifications of the defendant, (2) should have charged on general intent to commit sexual assault in the first degree, and (3) should have ordered a second competency examination. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
*479The jury could have found the following facts from the evidence adduced at…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. CaseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. DesLaurierConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. CrawleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.