Legal Opinion

Peinhardt v. Bonner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1936No. 6 Div. 986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Plaintiff sued Fred W. Peinhardt, D. S. Heck, and Lonnie Walker in trespass to realty — a vacant lot which he held as tenant, and upon which he had grown vegetables and flowers. Defendants Heck and Walker committed the actual trespass by going upon the lot and erecting a small storehouse thereon. The lot was formerly owned by the father of defendant Pein-hardt, and there was evidence from, which the jury could reasonably infer that defendants Heck and Walker were acting under directions and as agents for Peinhardt in committing the trespass upon the property, as above…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Steenhuis v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Ogburn-Griffin Gro. Co. v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Smith v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Alexander v. Handley, Reeves & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Karter v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Citizens Ins. Co. v. MathisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API