Legal Opinion

Steenhuis v. Holland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1927No. 3 Div. 825PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is by a personal representative under the Homicide Act (Oode, § 5696).

The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. Plaintiffs intestate came to his death by collision of an automobile in which he was riding with a street car of the Alabama Power Company, left standing .at night rinlighted on Bell street in the city of Montgomery- Defendant was the owner and driver of the car in which plaintiff’s intestate was a guest. For the purpose of the suit, it was admitted that, the collision was proximately caused by the negligence of defendant in operating the automobile and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dwight Mfg. Co. v. WordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Wright v. McCordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Smith v. GayleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Vandiver & Co. v. PollakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Home Telephone Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Tatum v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Daily v. SombergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Breen v. PeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Jehle-Slauson Const. Co. v. Hood-Rich Architects and Consulting EngineersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API