Legal Opinion

Citizens Ins. Co. v. Mathis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 29, 1936No. 8 Div. 674PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

The bill in this cause was filed by appellee, D. W. Mathis, against the Citizens Insurance Company, and Mary Painter.

The averments of the bill show that Mary Painter was interested in the subject matter of the litigation, and was, therefore, a necessary party to the suit.

The appeal is prosecuted by the Citizens Insurance Company from a decree of the circuit court setting aside and annulling for fraud a certain agreement for the settlement of the loss sustained by Mathis, occasioned by the destruction by fire of two buildings, which were insured by appellant. By rider attached…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith's v. CockrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Knotts v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  3. Merritt v. EhrmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  4. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. PropstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Dickinson v. Lewis, Garthwaite & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1859

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Spiller v. SlaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Roberson Motor Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API