Adams v. Hildebrand
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From an order granting a new trial on the issue of damages alone after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for wrongful death defendant appeals.
The essential facts are:
The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover damages for wrongful death of a child of the age of two years in the sum of $250. Thereafter on motion for a new trial the trial judge made the following order: “It is hereby ordered that the motion of the plaintiff Byron Q. Adams for a new trial in the above entitled action be and the same hereby is granted as to the issue of damages…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sassano v. RoullardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Wallace v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Santa Cruz v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Amore v. Di RestaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kralyevich v. MagriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Crandall v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.