Legal Opinion
Balloon v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1995No. C021686PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, Acting P. J.
The sole question presented by this writ petition is whether running of the one-year period allowed by Government Code section 12960 for the filing of an administrative complaint under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) was tolled during the plaintiff’s minority by application of Code of Civil Procedure section 352, or on equitable grounds. We hold it was not.
Petitioners, Walter Balloon, WVB Enterprises, Inc., and Foodmaker, Inc., collectively doing business as Jack In The Box, and Hargit Singh (hereafter defendants),…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Accardi v. SUPERIOR COURT OF VENTURA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Keiffer v. Bechtel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bjorndal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Wittkopf v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Rodriguez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.