Legal Opinion

State v. Herrin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 2011No. COA10-1446PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Judge.

Defendant Tony Allen Herrin appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of felonious malicious use of an explosive or incendiary device or material in violation of N.C.G.S. § 1449(a).

The evidence presented at trial tended to show that, in the early evening hours of 19 July 2009, defendant was visiting with some of the other residents in his mobile home community in Gastonia, North Carolina, when Julie Davenport rode towards the group on her child-sized bicycle. Mrs. Davenport and her husband, Daniel Davenport, lived next-door to defendant in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. BlackstockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re: Wash. Cty. Sheriff's Off.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  2. In Re: Wash. Cty. Sheriff's Off.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  3. State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API