Walker v. Walker
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
The record with which we are confronted does not comply with Rule 340, Rules of Civil Procedure, and tends to confuse rather than simplify the proceedings in the district court. The same fault exists as is called to attention in Pfeffer v. Finn, 239 Iowa 24, 30 N. W. 2d 481. See, also, McManis v. Keokuk Savings Bk. & Tr. Co., 239 Iowa 1105, 33 N. W. 2d 410. The record in this case contains numerous duplications. While we would be justified in ignoring a record on appeal presented in disregard of the rules, we shall not do so at this time so that we may dispose of the case as promptly as'…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McManis v. Keokuk Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Weatherill v. WeatherillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Pfeffer v. FinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Yetley v. YetleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Levis v. LevisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- In Re Adoption of CannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Fisher v. FisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Record v. RecordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.