Legal Opinion
Wexler v. Demaio
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 10, 2005No. AC 24737PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
In this medical malpractice case, the plaintiffs, Howard Wexler and Judy Wexler, challenge the trial court’s preclusion of their proposed expert testimony. The principal issue in this appeal concerns the court’s discretion to secure compliance with the disclosure requirements of Practice Book § 13-4 (4) and appropriate sanctions for failure to comply. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
By amended complaint filed August 7,1998, the plaintiffs brought an action against the defendant physicians John T. DeMaio, John M. DaSilva, Michael J. Tortora and Lynn K. Davis,1…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Edwards v. TardifSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Sullivan v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Shah v. Cover-It, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Menna v. JaimanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wexler v. DeMaioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Wexler v. DemaioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005