Legal Opinion
United States v. Lorince
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 13, 1991No. 88 C 3900PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this action the United States seeks to enforce defendant Julius Lorinee’s guarantee of payment upon a promissory note. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the government’s motion for summary judgment and grants Lorince’s cross-motion for summary judgment on the ground that this action was filed beyond the statute of limitations.
II. FACTS 1
On or about August 15, 1978, the Bremen Bank & Trust Company of Tinley Park,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Trebor Sportswear Co., Inc. And Rotano Sportswear Co., Inc., Plaintiffs v. The Limited Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Ramada Development Company v. Martin W. Rauch, Defendants-Third Party J. Stewart Stein, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Osvaldo CardonaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Joslin v. GregoryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- PNL Asset Management Co. v. Brenden & Taylor PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- In re WashingtonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Montierth v. DorssersIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Hope v. Quantum3 Group LLC (In re Seltzer)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.