Legal Opinion

Kohler v. Germain Investment Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1996No. 95CA0715PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RULAND.

This is an action to recover damages for underground contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons. Plaintiffs, Peter F. Kohler, Christa E. Kohler, Peter F. Kohler Revocable Trust, and Christa E. Kohler Revocable Trust, appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against defendants, Ger-main Investment Co., Clyde Eaton Smith, David McMahon (Germain defendants), and Conoco, Inc., based upon the statute of limitations. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

The record reflects that, until 1978, Conoco owned a filling station located to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mancuso v. United Bank of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Middelkamp v. Bessemer Irrigating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Tapley v. Golden Big O TiresSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Tamblyn v. Mickey & Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Hickman v. North Sterling Irrigation Dist.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoery v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Lavarato v. BranneyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Ditto v. Sanofi S.A.District Court, D. Colorado · 2024
  4. Florida Rock Properties, Inc. v. Hess CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. Hoery v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API