Legal Opinion

Boggs v. Die Fliedermaus, LLP

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 3, 2003No. 99 CIV. 245(RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Angela Boggs, Kimberly Hawkes, Staci Pollard, and Rhonda Roen-feldt (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) have moved for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., against defendants pro se Patrick Kelly (“Kelly”), Colin Walsh (“Walsh”), and Matt Tortoso (“Tortoso”) on Count Ten of the complaint alleging defamation and libel per se. The motion is denied as to Kelly and Walsh for the reasons set forth below.

Prior Proceedings

This action was commenced on April 2, 1999 against Die Fliedermaus, LLP, d/b/a Le Bar Bat (“Le Bar Bat”), and followed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Chapadeau v. Utica Observer-Dispatch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
Kevin Richardson v. Donald Selsky, Clement Capuano, William Fenton, Bernard LonczakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Boggs v. Die Fliedermaus, LLP.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
Langbehn v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADEDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009