Legal Opinion

Boggs v. Die Fliedermaus, LLP.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 7, 2003No. 99 Civ. 2451(RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Angela Boggs (“Boggs”), Kimberly Hawkes (“Hawkes”), Staci Pollard (“Pollard”), and Rhoda Roenfeldt (“Roen-feldt”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) have moved for reconsideration, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 and Local Civil Rule 6.3, of the denial of their motion for summary judgement as against defendants Patrick Kelly (“Kelly”) and Cohn Walsh (‘Walsh”) for defamation and libel per se under New York common law; and against Kelly for retaliation pursuant to § 296(7) of the New York State Human Rights Law and § 8-107(6) and § 8-107(19) of the New York…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. Duarte v. St. Barnabas HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Martin v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
  4. ASO, LLC, SHERWANI v. BEN JAMILDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
  5. Amended August 2, 2017 Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API