Legal Opinion
Nolan Bros. of Texas, Inc v. City of Royal Oak
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 1997No. Docket 179387PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, P.J.
Defendant, City of Royal Oak, appeals by leave granted from an order of the Oakland Circuit Court denying its motion for reconsideration of an earlier order granting partial summary disposition for plaintiff and denying defendant’s motion for partial summary disposition in this zoning action. We reverse.
The property at issue is located in the City of Royal Oak and is currently owned by the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT). Plaintiff has an option to purchase the property, which the MDOT obtained in 1984 following condemnation proceedings relating to the expansion of 1-696. At that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dearden v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Township of RichmondMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brandon Township v. North-Oakland Residential Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- State Highway Commissioner v. Redford TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- City of Detroit v. Volunteers of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Detroit v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Addison Township v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Pima County v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- City of Detroit v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Pima County v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.