Legal Opinion
Greene v. Zank
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1984No. B002009PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARABIAN, J.
Introduction
Plaintiff and appellant, Walter Greene, Jr. (Greene), brought an action against defendants and respondents, Gloria Zank, the State Bar of California, the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar and Mark C. Allen (referred to individually as Zank, State Bar, Committee of Bar Examiners or Committee and Allen, and referred to collectively as defendants), alleging a Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983) violation. The trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer without leave to amend and dismissed the action on the ground that judicial (quasi-judicial) immunity…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Catsouras v. Department of California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Jamgotchian v. SlenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Lebbos v. State BarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Fisher v. PickensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.