Legal Opinion

Burge v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1953No. S. F. 18876Published

1Opinion of the Court

41 Cal.2d 608 (1953)

LYNDLE E. BURGE, a Minor, etc., Appellant,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.

S. F. No. 18876.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Oct. 20, 1953.

John F. O'Sullivan, Millington, Dell'Ergo, Weeks & Morrissey for Appellant.

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Clayton W. Horn, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

TRAYNOR, J.

Plaintiff Lyndle E. Burge, a minor, by his father as guardian ad litem, brought this action against defendant city and county of San Francisco to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him while he was a passenger on a street-railway car…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Burge v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API