Legal Opinion

Geophysical Development Corp. v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 7, 1943No. 8209PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The controversy here arises out of an interference proceeding in the Patent Office, instituted under the provisions of R.S. § 4904,1 to determine priority of invention between parties claiming substantially the same invention. Appellants applied for a patent on a device for measuring radio activity. An interference was declared with the then pending application of one Neufeld, to which was subsequently added the later application of one Howell. The Office sustained in part a motion to dissolve as to Howell. Before any further steps were taken one Bender filed an application for a reissue of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. MaddoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  2. Earles v. GomberDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
  3. Allen v. United States ex rel. LowryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905
  4. Tepas v. GeldhofCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Christensson v. HogdalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Krasnow v. BenderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. Application of RogoffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Application of Karl Ziegler, Heinz Breil, Erhard Holzkamp and Heinz MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API