Grimwood v. Macke

— Proceedings on the petition of the appellees for the location and opening of a highway. The viewers having reported in favor of the “public utility” of the proposed way, the appellants, with others, filed a remonstrance, alleging that the way would not be of “ public utility,” and, also, filed claims for damages. Thereupon the board of commis*101sioners appointed reviewers, “to review the proposed highway, report on utility, to assess damages, if any, and make written report to the board,” etc.

At the next term of the board, the reviewers presented a report that the way would not be of public…