Legal Opinion

Singleton v. Cushman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1947No. 17,501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crumpacker, c. J.

On or about May 7, 1941, Charles H. Hepner and wife conveyed, by warranty deed, certain improved real estate in the city of Gary, Indiana, commonly known as No. 2609 Massachusetts Street, to the appellee and appellant and in said deed designated them as “Lovell R. Cushman and Isabella Cushman, husband and wife.” On September 17, 1942, the appellee and appellant, designating themselves as “Lovell R. Cushman and Isabella Cushman, husband and wife,” deeded said property to one William Drake, an unmarried man, who, the following day, reconveyed it to the appellee as the sole…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Colip v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. GloverIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Fouty v. FoutyIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Bibb v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spanier v. SpanierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Emmons v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Baker v. ChambersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Pierce v. HALLOregon Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API