Legal Opinion

Spanier v. Spanier

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1951No. 18,084PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

— Appellant brought this action against appellee for partition, alleging that the parties are tenants in common of certain real estate. From an adverse judgment appellant prosecutes this appeal, claiming error by the court in overruling his motion for a new trial.

At the outset we are met by appellee’s contention that no question is presented because the grounds of the motion are such as may only be presented by independent assignments of error. However this may have been formerly, appellee’s contention is without merit by reason of Rule 2-6. This rule now provides: “If, in the trial court, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. McCoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Smith v. SwitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Vail v. Department of Financial InstitutionsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Gilmer v. HurstIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Campbell v. GithensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. LINDSEY, SHERIFF, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hill v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Emmons v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. ROOP, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC. v. WoodsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Farm & Home Insurance v. TempletonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API