Legal Opinion

Pine Tree Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 23, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, Justice.

Pine Tree Telephone and Telegraph Company appeals from a Public Utilities Commission (the commission) decision requiring Pine Tree to reduce its revenues by $720,-910. Pine Tree challenges the commission’s decision to the extent that it: (1) allocates the burden of proof to Pine Tree; (2) uses a residual ratemaking methodology; (3) includes revenues and expenses from Pine Tree’s interstate billing and collections activities in Pine Tree’s total revenues and expenses; (4) adopts a hypothetical capital structure without first finding that Pine Tree’s rates were unreasonable;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pine Tree Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  2. American Ass'n of Retired Persons v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Ed Friedman v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  4. In re Appeal of Investigation into Existing Rates of Shoreham Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. Enhanced Communications of Northern New England, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API