Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Investigation into Existing Rates of Shoreham Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 17, 2006No. 05-077PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. Shoreham Telephone Company, Inc. appeals from a Public Service Board order requiring that it reduce its revenues from intrastate telephone service by over $1.2 million. Shoreham contends: (1) the Board violated state and federal law by employing a methodology that impermissibly uses interstate revenues to subsidize intrastate rates; (2) the order will produce intrastate rates that are *59confiscatory; (3) the Board’s disallowance of income-tax expense from Shoreham’s intrastate cost of service is unsupported by the evidence, unjust, and unreasonable; and (4) the order to establish a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. In Re New England Tel. & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  5. Town of Hinesburg v. DunklingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Northwestern Medical Center Fiscal Year 2024 / in Re Rutland Regional Medical Center Fiscal Year 2024Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024
  2. All Metals RecyclingVermont Superior Court · 2015
  3. In re Investigation into Existing Rates of Shoreham Telephone Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. State v. Harley Breer, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API